[RULE] Need help with scripting Vacuum

Martin Stricker shugal at gmx.de
Fri Dec 13 03:30:36 EET 2002


Eugene Wong wrote:

> Also, as I typed out the previous paragraphs, I thought that maybe
> this type of script doesn't need getopt, because it would only
> require 1 option at most, plus any other file names. Maybe we could
> make Vacuum require at least 1 option, no matter what, so that it
> would make life easier for us to write code that directly tries to
> deal with ${1}, and if there are no options given, then it could just
> display usage & help information.

Fine with me. But two things to think about: Using only one option might
be a bit unflexible, and it's maybe a good thing to learn getopt
anyway... ;-)))

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/
Red Hat Linux 7.3 for low memory: http://www.rule-project.org/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/


_______________________________________________
Original home page of the RULE project: www.rule-project.org
Original Rule Development Site http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/
Original RULE mailing list: Rule-list at nongnu.org, hosted at http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list




This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here