[RULE] Font paths, was: Problem starting X

[M. Fioretti]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 22:13:56 at 10:13:56PM +0200, Ingo Lantschner  ingo at vum.at  wrote:
> 
> 4. Somewhere on the list I read that replacing xfs with static
> font-pathes may be good for performance. Is this still true?

This is true when you install applications that need xfs (**). Newer
applications, especially in Red Hat, have already started using the
new fontconfig/xft2 font system. They don't need xfs at all.

	Ciao,

		Marco Fioretti

(**) check the output of rpm --requires on the rpm package that you
want to install to know it
-- 
Marco Fioretti                 mfioretti
Red Hat for low memory         www.rule-project.org

[Crash programs] fail because they are based on the theory that, with
nine women pregnant, you can get a baby a month.
						Wernher von Braun


_______________________________________________
Original home page of the RULE project: www.rule-project.org
Original Rule Development Site http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/
Original RULE mailing list: Rule-list at nongnu.org, hosted at http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list