[Rule-list] Distributing the distro
Kerry
redhatrob at earthlink.net
Mon Feb 18 02:47:34 EET 2002
A terrible example would be Win95 117MB install = CRAP.
I dunno.... it's something to shoot for.
At least if it's only as good as Win95, at least it will run a 486
ichi at ihug.co.nz wrote:
> Vik Olliver wrote:
> >
> > It ocurred to me that a distro with such a small footprint
> > would be an ideal candidate for peer-to-peer updating.
>
> Small footprint? So far, it appears you guys are talking about
> 200-300mb. That may seem small to people with 10gig harddrives,
> but it's way too big for my 486-33 with 170mb HD. I reckon you
> should be aiming for a base installation of no bigger than 80mb
> (including X, wm and graphical browser).
>
> Cheers,
> Steven
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rule-list mailing list
> Rule-list at mail.freesoftware.fsf.org
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
_______________________________________________
Rule-list mailing list
Rule-list at mail.freesoftware.fsf.org
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here