[Rule-list] Modified installer
Brock Organ
borgan at redhat.com
Tue Feb 19 16:07:26 EET 2002
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 20:34, Devon wrote:
>
> Yes, but troubling that your machine failed to boot with the mem=24M
> parameter. I can't see where it could be related to the installer
> changes, however. The fact that it boots without the kernel parameter
> would seem to indicate that the module exists and can be loaded.
> If you have the time and inclination, could you do a base install (custom
> class, selecting no packages) of the official release and try the mem=24M
> option? I'm curious, but have no means at my disposal to test this
> further.
I've since tested the RULE image on a different machine (ide based) and
the mem= line works just fine ... I've seen this issue enough in the
last few months to know there is a gremlin somewhere (probably in the
kernel or initrd) but we haven't nailed down the problem ...
--
Brock Organ QA Engineer borgan at redhat.com
"That which we are, we are..." "I `em what I`em!"
-Alfred, Lord Tennyson -Popeye, Lord Sailor
_______________________________________________
Rule-list mailing list
Rule-list at mail.freesoftware.fsf.org
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here