[Rule-list] graphical browser redux
Marco Fioretti
m.fioretti at inwind.it
Sun Mar 10 12:12:37 EET 2002
Larry,
About window managers, please read
http://www/freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/window_man.html
and let me know your opinion. ANy contribution is welcome!
Choosing the wm is in my opinion partly independent from the
availability of configuration tools for it. I say this because there
are several wm lean and mean by themselves, but with config tools
requiring GTK/QT. Such libraries are not guaranteed to be on a RULE
box, for obbvious reasons, and installing them only for something that
one does once or seldom is not worth it.
In other words, configuration on a RULE box is going to be mostly
editing ASCII files, simply because it is much lighter on
ram/disk/etc..
Other issues in your message:
vnc: YES
using RPMs: YES, of course for all the reasons you
mention. Whenever standard ones exist we just use them, otherwise, as
you say, we will choose a maintainer for each application, and he will
make it available to the project. We definitely want to have
everything under rpm control, even because if one installs other RH
packages after RULE may be in trouble otherwise.
"browsers that write to the linux framebuffer" Which ones?
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
RULE project leader
--
The three most dangerous things are a programmer with a soldering
iron, a manager who codes, and a user who gets ideas.
_______________________________________________
Rule-list mailing list
Rule-list at mail.freesoftware.fsf.org
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here