[Rule-list] Xfree for RULE roadmap
Marco Fioretti
m.fioretti at inwind.it
Fri Apr 19 17:03:53 EEST 2002
Martin wrote:>
> It would install, but would it work? --nodeps and --force are
> *dangerous*, you should use them only if you know *exactly* what you
> are doing.
>
I agree with Martin: messing with --nodeps and --force should be avoided
as much as possible, also because it could break other rpms installed
later.
> I think we'll have to provide our own RULE X solution on the long
> term.
> But that will take a lot of work and time...
I was thinking the same thing myself, but maybe is not so bad (not
high priority anyway). The solution in many cases could be something
like:
1) Video card supported by Red Hat stock X, enough HW resources?
install standard X rpms
2) Old video card *not* supported anymore?
install older X version supporting it, rpm repackaged/
recompiled if needed, but not hacked
3) Other cases
a) Ouch!
b) Call to the rescue XFree developers
c) time will tell
Let's try option 2 when possible, and see what happens.
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
RULE project leader
_______________________________________________
Rule Project HOME PAGE: http://www.rule-project.org/rule/
Original Rule Development Site http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/Rule-list at mail.freesoftware.fsf.org
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here