[Rule-list] Re:Is in the fly compression needed?

chris clark clarkcd at myrealbox.com
Wed May 29 03:50:54 EEST 2002


It seems to me that compression is not a simple yes/no
issue. The degree to which it might be helpful is
likely to vary considerably for different machines,
depending on their CPU/RAM/Disk space balance.

On the machine that can't fit the files that the user 
wants any other way, its VERY necessary.

I was thinking of having different options at install.
Maybe 1=compress nothing, 
2=only big, noncritical stuff
(For instance, compress all manpages,/usr/doc, and 
similarly non-performance oriented stuff.), 
and 3=compress everything possible.

certainly the catagories would require discussion and testing, but It seems like the benefits on really low
end hardware would be large, and any machine with less
than a gig would see a noticable benefit.
Disk space is even more important with newer kernels, if I understand correctly, as they need more swap than 
the older ones.
 


_______________________________________________
Rule Project HOME PAGE:  http://www.rule-project.org/rule/
Original Rule Development Site http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/Rule-list at mail.freesoftware.fsf.org
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list



This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here