[RULE] Preparing RULE for FC2
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz at simpaticus.com
Thu May 13 00:52:40 EEST 2004
At 11:50 5/12/2004, Martin Stricker wrote:
> > 2. Synchronize at least once a day, preferably more (if no
> > changes have been made, the extra syncs will carry no traffic and
> > thus causes no additional load)
>
>Do you expect that many critical changes? I think once a day is
>absolutely sufficient. I would even go with every other day.
Critical changes? No... I wasn't thinking of that. If, however, more and
more people are going to get involved and start contributing pages,
comments, etc. to the site, then doing (for example) four tiny updates from
the main site (say, one 10-second rsync transaction every 6 hours) is
really no more work than doing it all once a day, but two good things happen:
a) The odd connectivity problem which prevents one sync job from
completing leaves you with a shorter "outdated" interval.
b) Even small changes propagate more quickly.
The cost (human, computational, and transport) of doing rsync every 6 hours
instead of every 24 is exceedingly small, I think. Especially with the low
volume of changes, as you noted.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz at simpaticus.com
http://www.simpaticus.com
_______________________________________________
Original home page of the RULE project: www.rule-project.org
Original Rule Development Site http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/
Original RULE mailing list: Rule-list at nongnu.org, hosted at http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
This full static mirror of the Run Up to Date Linux Everywhere Project mailing list, originally hosted at http://lists.hellug.gr/mailman/listinfo/rule-list, is kept online by Free Software popularizer, researcher and trainer Marco Fioretti. To know how you can support this archive, and Marco's work in general, please click here