[RULE] APT, YUM or URPMI on RULE, was: Mini-KDE

[david jamison]

>>  
>>
>
>I'm sure there is, but haven't figured out myself yet. Part of my
>problems with this is simply that, due to lack of extra PCs and work
>reasons, I haven't had yet the possibility to install FC2 on my two
>PCs: I have paid stuff to finish, which requires RH9, before I can
>stop and start everything from scratch.
>
>
>  
>
Maybe this, in part,  is a good reason to stay with RH9 for now?  Im 
watching the Fedora mailing list and there are comments comming on there 
that Fedora will always be a developmental rather than a production 
distro and I must admit that thought had crossed my mind from what Ive 
read on the Fedora concept.  Im sure Red Hat *really* want people to use 
RHEL with Fedora being at best a test bed.  Should RULE not stick with 
RH9 and its legacy project for the foreseeable future and keep a watch 
on Fedora to see how it matures?

>Another reason to focus for now only on the kde-base/kdelibs area,
>leaving Qt alone, is that this also guarantees that, if you need only:
>
>       KOffice from RULE, plus
>       just one other custom application built on standard Qt
>
>that the result will surely work.
>

Hopefully!   Im still trying to get Qt running on RULE first though!!!

>
>Ciao,
>	Marco
>
>  
>